Current:Home > NewsMichigan’s top court gives big victory to people trying to recoup cash from foreclosures -Elevate Money Guide
Michigan’s top court gives big victory to people trying to recoup cash from foreclosures
View
Date:2025-04-15 07:01:19
DETROIT (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court said Monday that its 2020 decision stopping local governments from keeping cash windfalls from the sale of foreclosed homes can be applied retroactively, meaning that hundreds of millions of dollars could potentially be returned to people who lost properties over unpaid taxes.
Local governments were “essentially stealing from people,” said Christina Martin, an attorney who argued the case for former property owners. “It doesn’t matter if it’s going to be expensive to pay them back. They have to pay them back.”
For years, counties kept profits from the sale of foreclosed homes or land — even if the leftover cash far exceeded the amount of unpaid property taxes.
For example, Uri Rafaeli owed $8.41 in taxes on a rental property in Southfield. The bill grew to $285 with penalties and interest. Oakland County sold the house for $24,500 but kept the balance, which was legal at the time.
The Supreme Court in 2020 said the practice violated the Michigan Constitution. And now the court said the ruling can be applied retroactively to foreclosures that happened before the opinion was released four years ago.
“It’s a no-brainer,” Martin said.
Writing for the court, Justice Brian Zahra said the case “involves governmental violation of the constitutional rights of numerous individuals.”
He said “we are not without sympathy” toward communities that kept the surplus cash because state law had allowed it.
“Nonetheless, while the problem originated with the Legislature,” Zahra wrote, “at the foundation of our government is the precept that no state officer or local government can justify a constitutional violation on the basis of a statutory directive.”
Phil Ellison, another attorney for former property owners, said tens of thousands of people now might qualify for payment.
The Michigan Municipal League, which represents local governments, argued against making the 2020 decision retroactive, saying communities shouldn’t be penalized for following what was allowed under law. Complying with this ruling could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, they warned.
“The result is potential fiscal chaos across the state, as local governments will be forced to either cut services or raise taxes and fees to make up the holes in their budgets,” the group said in a court filing.
___
Follow Ed White on X at https://twitter.com/edwritez
veryGood! (42124)
Related
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Biden’s Early Climate Focus and Hard Years in Congress Forged His $2 Trillion Clean Energy Plan
- Yes, the big news is Trump. Test your knowledge of everything else in NPR's news quiz
- Facing Grid Constraints, China Puts a Chill on New Wind Energy Projects
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- How to cut back on junk food in your child's diet — and when not to worry
- Tom Hanks Getting His Honorary Harvard Degree Is Sweeter Than a Box of Chocolates
- Tina Turner's Cause of Death Revealed
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Supreme Court rules against Navajo Nation in legal fight over water rights
Ranking
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- The first office for missing and murdered Black women and girls set for Minnesota
- Could the Flight Shaming Movement Take Off in the U.S.? JetBlue Thinks So.
- 'Hidden fat' puts Asian Americans at risk of diabetes. How lifestyle changes can help
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Lily-Rose Depp and 070 Shake's Romance Reaches New Heights During Airport PDA Session
- Taylor Swift and Ice Spice's Karma Remix Is Here and It's Sweet Like Honey
- E-cigarette sales surge — and so do calls to poison control, health officials say
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
How Pruitt’s EPA Is Delaying, Weakening and Repealing Clean Air Rules
Arctic Drilling Lease Sale Proposed for 2019 in Beaufort Sea, Once Off-Limits
How a 93-year-old visited every national park and healed a family rift in the process
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Bumblebee Decline Linked With Extreme Heat Waves
Who co-signed George Santos' bond? Filing reveals family members backed indicted congressman
Rust armorer facing an additional evidence tampering count in fatal on-set shooting